Fancycache vs supercache install#
Fancycache vs supercache software#
Fancycache vs supercache windows 7#

Gaming and Rendering are worlds apart, in that Rendering's primary acceleration comes from 'abundance' i.e. Thanks a billion in advance for your advice!Д«ecause if avoiding overclocking completely means I have a better chance of NOT having to replace my CPU, then I'm curious if I'll miss any real performance benefits from running everything at stock.

Fancycache vs supercache windows 7#

PS- I am aware that Windows 7 64-bit Home Premium only supports 16GB of RAM, so I'd have to go with Pro/Ult. (c) Other than creating a much larger-capacity RAMDisk, would I likely benefit from 32GB instead of 16GB (which means I'll have to settle for higher Stock CAS Latencies and might thus be more tempted to overclock) in any of my gaming/applications?

Fancycache vs supercache install#

(b) What is the best way to benefit from a RAMDisk using Adobe Creative Suite Programs? For example, do I merely install and run Photoshop from the RAMDisk, but save my actual finished. (a) Is there any benefit to running a game, let's say an MMO like Guild Wars 2 or APB (which uses the Unreal engine if I'm not mistaken), completely off of a RAMdisk as compared to a 256GB SSD? Although eager to start playing around with XMP and getting better performance, especially in gaming, I'm a little nervous since my AMD Athlon ењ†4 core just died after five years of being completely unaltered. I would say I understand the relationship of CAS latency and frequencies, but I lack understanding of the noticeable benefits in real-world implementation. *By 'better', I mean in terms of the risk of CPU degradation and shortened life expectancy (if there is any from overclocking RAM) versus the actual noticeable benefits (in either gaming, design, or trans-coding/encoding).Д«ecause if avoiding overclocking completely means I have a better chance of NOT having to replace my CPU, then I'm curious if I'll miss any real performance benefits from running everything at stock.

Overclocking 2x8GB (=16GB) DDR3 sticks ( Like this G.Skill kit) up to 2400 frequency and 10 CAS latency, (as it is rated by G.Skill to run at least that high)? If I have found DDR3 RAM running stock 1600 frequency and 7 CAS latency ( Like this Mushkin Kit), will 4x4GB (=16GB) of these RAM sticks running at stock be *better for me than: I'm aware that in order to reach greater frequencies than 1600 on DDR3 RAM for this setup, I have to 'overclock' the RAM either using XMP or whatever. My first question involves finding an optimal RAM configuration. I also intend to experiment with a size-able RAMdisk with available RAM. It will be used for moderate-heavy gaming, moderate-heavy Adobe Photoshop/Illustrator/Flash design work, and mild-moderate video trans-coding and video editing in Premiere Pro. On a side note disabling Write Cache Buffer Flushing can improve HDD write speeds in Windows, however I don't recommend doing this on the system drive.I'm about to build a new machine with an ASUS P8Z77-V mobo and an Intel Core i7-3770K. ( Is this post really as long winded as it seems? lol) So yeah the guys above who had huge caches will see very high benchmark numbers because as far as CrystalDisk is concerned, the transfer is complete as soon as the file is copied to RAM, not when it's written to disk. Try again using an 8GB cache and you'll see lightning fast (reported) transfer times. That's why your transfer times seemed slow, because they were. Once that happens all data in RAM must be written to the HDD (buffer flushing), before new data can be copied to RAM. RAM simply acts as a buffer, so data is first copied to the 512MB of RAM u reserved, while simultaneously writing from RAM to the HDD.Д«ut data is copied to RAM faster than it can be written from RAM to the HDD so it takes only a few seconds for the 512MB RAM to fill up. For the sake of simplicity your 512MB cache will now be called RAM: But from my (professional) experience, it's very hard to notice any improvement except for specific situations (which I haven't found yet really ).Д¬lick to expand.Yeah because you were writing 4.5GB to a disk with only 512Mb of cache. I'm just kidding, I'm very interested about this topic. Please show us a screenshot of a 10GB copying action over those drives at 99% completion When you copy a very large file from G- to C-drive, at what speed does the action end? The file still needs to be copied to the slower HDD, so I reckon the speed rate will fall dramatically at the end of the copying action (or at shutdown or other checkpoints). In the background probably.ДЄbout the writes. Shutdows will be slower as the data has to be written to the HDD and startups will be slower due to starting caching the data from the disk.

Fancycache vs supercache software#

PrimoCache probably does the same thing by software in RAM. A 40GB SSD cache drive using Intel Smart Response Technology will cache the most accessed data 'more permanently' (but a lot slower). But the improved reads will only shine when the data to be fetched has been cached already.